The Spiritual Imperative of the Divine Maternity and Marian Consecration: Part I


The Spiritual Imperative of the Divine Maternity and Marian Consecration

 “Ignorance of Mary denotes a profound ignorance of both Scripture and of God Himself…The person who understands God understands Mary’s greatness. However, he who does not understand God’s greatness cannot understand Mary’s greatness, and that is why ignorance of Mary is ignorance of God.” [1] (Monsignor Anthony La Femina)
Not enough can be said by Catholics about the great love Our Lady has for mankind! The Blessed Virgin Mary has often been an unnecessary stumbling block for potential converts to the Catholic faith. Since the Protestant revolt in the 16th century much falsehood has been spread about the Holy Mother of God and in doing so much falsehood has been spread about the very nature of Jesus Christ. “When Our Lady’s God-given privileges are rejected and ridiculed, how sadly history shows that her Son fares no better.”[2] From the earliest Ecumenical Councils of the Church to numerous papal documents to the countless testimony of the Saints throughout the centuries, the Blessed Mother of God holds a unique and important place in Catholicism. In fact, it can be said that without recognizing her unique place and role in God’s plan for the salvation of mankind that one ceases to be a true Christian. Simply stated, “Authentic Christianity cannot exist without due veneration of and tender love for the mother whom God chose, formed and loved from all eternity to be His very own mother.”[3] Unfortunately, there are also many Catholics who are ignorant of the role of the Mother of God and I intend to make a small contribution to dispel at least some of this ignorance and foster greater devotion to her.
Mary’s Divine Maternity and Her Immaculate Conception
The first central dogma concerning Our Lady is what is known as her Divine Maternity. The title of Theotokos, the ‘Mother of God’, or ‘God-Bearer’ and the subsequent theology that flows from it was defined as a dogma of in 431 at the third ecumenical Council at Ephesus. The Council clearly proclaimed, “If anyone does not profess that Emmanuel is truly God and that consequently the Holy Virgin is the Mother of God, let him be anathema.”[4] This motherhood does not only refer to Jesus in His human nature but also to that of His divine nature. The simple logic is that Jesus’s entire person with both natures was born of the Virgin Mary. How can Jesus be born and not retain both natures as a person? The Council Fathers led by Saint Cyril of Alexandria chose to use the term hypostatic union to describe the, “two different natures come together to form a unity, and from both arose one Christ, one Son.”[5] Although the Council focused on the heresy of Nestorius, which in a confusing manner denied the unified person of Christ in His two natures, Arian heretics and others had completely denied Christ’s divinity, and this dogmatic definition solidified the teaching that Jesus the God-Man was born of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
While the strict dogmatic definitions of these two Councils were mainly directed at defending the orthodox teaching about the personhood of Christ, Mary’s divine maternity runs much deeper into the Church’s theology and spirituality. The uniqueness of Mary being the Mother of God is clear in Sacred Scripture when Elizabeth recognizes her divine maternity, “And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” (Luke 1:43) Elizabeth then extols Mary’s faith in listening to and accepting her role as the Mother of God. Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange so eloquently stated, “The divine maternity is, therefore, … the foundation, source, and root of all Mary’s graces and privileges,”[6] At the annunciation it was made clear that the Holy Spirit would come upon her and from this, the incarnation would take place. It is important to understand that Jesus’ human nature was passed on to him through Mary’s human nature, untouched by sin, and that the Holy Spirit was at work in the hypostatic union of Christ in His divine nature. This is a mystery to be sure, but the working of the Holy Trinity is clearly at work here in a unique manner only found in this instance through Mary’s divine maternity and thus, “Mary became the first human being to whom God revealed the inscrutable mystery of His intimate Trinitarian Life.”[7]
Mary at the foot of the cross was made by Christ Himself the spiritual Mother of the Church and all Christians. As she stood beneath the cross, she heard Jesus in saying to her “Women, behold your son” referring to Saint John the Evangelist. This presents the reality of her role as mother of all the faithful. It may appear that this passage of Sacred Scripture was the first time that this reality was cast into the public eye. The truth is however, that this reality is presented much earlier in the Gospels. By the mere act of Mary’s humble acceptance as a handmaid to the announcement of the angel of her divine maternity, she instantly became our spiritual mother, “By that act she conceived us spiritually.”[8] It is from this font of divine maternity that the intercession and mediation of Our Lady flow forth.In Mary's case we have a special and exceptional mediation, based upon her "fullness of grace," which was expressed in the complete willingness of the "handmaid of the Lord." In response to this interior willingness of his Mother, Jesus Christ prepared her ever more completely to become for all people their "mother in the order of grace."[9] As we will soon see there is more to understanding the biblical phrase “full of grace”.
It must be said that Mary was chosen by God from all eternity to be Jesus’ mother. It is obviously fitting that Jesus would never have allowed Himself to be touched by the works of Satan through the fallen nature of humanity tainted by original sin. Jesus chose to make His mother perfect regarding her humanity, being that her humanity was intimately united to the hypostatic union. She would not only be the perfect ark for Him, but she was His Immaculate Mother and thus of His very flesh. “Holiness is the sum total of all God’s attributes and, with due respect for His own divine nature, what other kind of mother could God make for Himself except a worthy, i.e. holy, mother?”[10] This preservation of Mary from original sin is known as the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. Although formally pronounced ex-cathedra by Pope Pius IX only in 1854, this teaching is based in the Scriptures and has been taught by the Fathers of the Church and all the Saints through the ages. Saint Ephraim the Syrian in his 361 praises Our Lord and His Mother, "You alone and your Mother are more beautiful than any others, for there is no blemish in you nor any stains upon your Mother. Who of my children can compare in beauty to these?"[11] As we can see, this dogma is closely connected to the dogma of her divine maternity and her close union with Christ.  “Mary has a consanguineous relationship in the direct line to the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity.  No other woman exists who can make this boast!”[12]
Mary’s holiness is attested to in Sacred Scripture. The most heavily quoted portion of Scripture in reference to her holiness is Luke 1:28, “And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.” Many know this passage, but few truly understand its significance due in no small part to inadequate biblical translation, which does not fully convey its meaning. Does the translation from Latin, “full of grace” adequately convey the total reality of the status of Mary’s holiness? “The Latin and English translations of the text, usually “Gratia Plena” or “Full of Grace”, do not do justice to the Greek text.”[13] The Greek word used is Kecharitomene, which is a title rather than an adjective. Ultimately it is a title that expresses an action or more specifically expresses a predetermined and ongoing reality that contains the entire meaning of Mary as ‘The Immaculate Conception!’ When someone asks if the dogma of the Immaculate Conception is contained in Sacred Scripture, you can answer in the affirmative! Monsignor Anthony La Femina explains,
Kecharitomene may be rendered as “Pre-sanctified One.”  This translation is not one that interprets the Greek word but rather, one that renders a literal translation of it. Thus, Gabriel’s greeting would have been “Hail, Pre-sanctified One. The Lord is with you!” This most singular grace of pre-sanctification is called Mary’s Immaculate Conception… The grace of the immaculate conception made Mary to be above all others of God’s creation and from the first moment of her conception, to most resemble God.”[14]  
Looking here at the Greek word and its much deeper meaning than we are offered through common translation. We can see a significant reality about Our Lady not commonly understood among Catholics. “Hail Presanctified One!” demonstrates Mary’s role as being chosen by God before all eternity to be immaculately conceived for the sole reason of becoming Jesus’ mother. There was indeed a reason the Blessed Mother referred to herself as ‘The Immaculate Conception’ in Lourdes, France. It was clearly a reminder that it was through her that all believers would be triumphant over the dominion of Satan. This reality leads us to look deeper at Mary’s action in the life of the Church as the ‘Women’ who will crush Satan’s head, ultimately acting as co-redemptrix and the mediatrix of all graces.
Mary as the ‘Women’
Following the leitmotif of Msgr. Anthony La Femina’s lecture titledMary’s Signal Place in Authentic Christianity’, I will focus now on how the title of ‘Women’ in the Gospel of John is closely related to Genesis. In fact, the passage of John cannot be understood without referring to the prophetic text of Genesis. The use of the word ‘Women’ to refer to Our Lady is found twice in the Gospel of John. Its use is found at the Wedding Feast at Cana and at the foot of the cross. It is interesting that St. John never refers to Mary by her name, but to this mysterious title of ‘Women.’ Why does Jesus use this term when referring to His mother? Was it to denigrate her as many Protestants contend? This ignorant interpretation demonstrates how many people read the Scriptures but hardly understand its meaning! Upon closer inspection, we see a clear connection between Genesis 3:15 and John 2:4. The passage of Genesis reads, “I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.” In the Gospel of John Jesus answers His mother after her making it known to Him that there was no more wine in the following manner, “Woman, what is that to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come.” Monsignor explains,
“At the marriage feast of Cana, Jesus himself reveals the identity of the mysterious Woman of Genesis. He does this by addressing his mother with the title of “Woman” (Jn 2:4). By making this identification, Jesus reveals Himself as the Woman’s offspring. In this manner, John discloses the identity of the two persons decreed to fulfill the prophecy of Genesis…  By addressing his mother with the title used in the prophecy of Genesis, Jesus openly identifies his mother as the Woman of Genesis who, as his companion in his redemptive hour, will conquer the devil in favor of the human race.  Jesus associates and includes Mary to his hour set by the Father for the redemption of the world.”[15]
This reality is significant because it clearly shows Mary’s role not only as a mediator in the role of salvation, but also as an instrumental cause of the triumph of the Church and henceforth of all believers over Satan! By virtue of her close union with Christ, she is the one who crushes the head of Satan in Genesis. She is the long-awaited fulfillment of the prophecy. I think the connection of Mary’s spiritual participation in her role as mediatrix is very apparent in comparing both passages. Her title demands action. The action of Mary as the ‘Women’ crushing the head of Satan is directly connected to Mary’s intercession at Cana where she in effect declares the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry. Jesus’ ministry is completed with His perfect Sacrifice on the cross through which Satan is defeated. “Who else would be a terror to the demon but the Promised Woman?”[16] Mary’s spiritual action as mediatrix and intercessor is not only for this instance, but it is her role for all time in the life of the Church. “She would intercede for its members until the day her Son would return and take all the faithful on earth to Himself. Her role would ever be Daughter, Spouse, Mother, Intercessor and Refuge of Sinners.[17]
Go to Part II


[1] Monsignor Anthony LaFemina. STL., JCD, Mary’s Signal Place In Authentic Christianity (Private Lecture 2019)
[2] Eamon R. Carroll, Mary In the Documents of the Magisterium (Mariology Vol I, 1954, Public Domain)
[4] The Council of Ephesus, Anathema #1 451
[5] Saint Cyril, Second Letter to Nestorius, (430AD)
[6] Reverend Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange O.P., The Mother of the Saviour (TAN Books, 1993) P39
[7] Monsignor Anthony LaFemina. STL., JCD, Mary’s Signal Place In Authentic Christianity, (Private Lecture 2019)
[8] Reverend Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange O.P., The Mother of the Saviour (TAN Books, 1993) P39
[9] John Paul II, Redemptoris Mater, Para 39, (March 25th, 1987)
[10] Monsignor Anthony LaFemina. STL., JCD, Mary’s Signal Place In Authentic Christianity, (Private Lecture 2019)
[11] Ephraim the Syrian, Nisibene Hymns 27:8 (361)
[12] Monsignor Anthony LaFemina. STL., JCD, Mary’s Signal Place In Authentic Christianity, (Private Lecture 2019)
[13] Ibid
[14] Ibid
[15] Ibid
[16] Mother Mary Angelica, The Promised Woman (EWTN 1977) P61
[17] Ibid


Matthew J. Bellisario


Comments